Monday, August 30, 2021

Thoughts on priThvi - bhudevi and how Hindus look at land and sacred geography of India - march 25th 2021 twitter

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India License.


This line of kālidāsa from kumārasambhava shows how Hindus looked at the word “Prthvi”.

उत्तर दिशा में हिमालय नामक देवताओं की आत्मा पर्वतों का राजा है, जो पूर्व और पश्चिम दिशा में स्थित दोनों समुद्रों में पृथ्वी के मानदण्ड की तरह प्रविष्ट होकर खड़ा है.

pRthvī is not just a generic word for planet earth or land. It is also a specific word for India (land from himālayas to the (two/three) oceans is one rāshTra - पृथिव्यै समुद्रपर्यन्ताया एकराळिति). Interestingly, one of the coolest regal epithets was of sātavāhana emperors found near paiTHaN (their first capital - which later moved to downstream of godāvarī) is त्रिसमुद्रतोयपीतवाहन. tri-samudra-toya-pīta-vāhana - one who’s mount/horse has drunk the water of all three seas. This motif of “land until the oceans” is oft seen in Hindu polity time and again.

It also reflects on decisions by Hindu polity at the heights of its imperium (various points in history) of not going outside this sacred land for permanent conquests and settlements. The original of “my horse drank the water of so and so river/sea/town/well” is used quite regularly even in 18th century CE Hindu polity. Horses from bhīmā river (Pune region) drinking water of yamunā (Delhi) and Sindhu (Attock) is often heard in conversations of that era. It has also acquired a different (and naughty) meaning in colloquial speak.

“बारागाव/बारा विहिरींचे पाणी प्यालेला” is a popular phrase in Marathi. It literally means one who has drunk water of 12 towns/wells. An experienced person. Alternatively, well here can also mean as, how to put it delicately, well, vagina.

So the phrase still refers to an “experienced man” ie a philanderer. 😀  Drinking water from some water source refers to fulfilling one’s trishNā - thirst / desire. To “upabhog (completely enjoy?). Ability upabhog at will. The phrase vīrabhogyā vasundharā refers to this too. To “bhog” and to protect vasundharā is the duty of a “bhupati” (vishNu/ king) 

Thoughts on role of MKG in creating a case for Hindu dominated Indian nation-state - march 14th 2021 on twitter

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India License.


Pappu is actually right on this one IMO. This is not his idea anyway. Shesh Rao More has written on it in detail in Marathi.

Post WW1, question of independence was settled. Whom to hand over power to - was the question.

Gandhi’s role is to be acknowledged in this aspect. He made a case (like Jinnah) that secular Hindu dominated India was a contender just like a Muslim-nation case. Islamic nation case is obvious and self evident for Xian British.

Hindus as one nation - Brits never understood 
All important leaders post 1920 are in process of trying to prove to Brits that they are “nation”.

Nation as per Abrahamics is a self governable group of people with sense of belonging ness towards each other owing to some common features - language/race/religion/caste/something. Even (electorally) small leaders like Ambedkar, Savarkar et al are in process of creating their case of a "Dalit" nation, or a "hindu" nation etc.

This is exactly the answer to all the fools who parrot the line that Sangh did not participate in freedom struggle as an organization. The scenario had changed. Anyone fighting with British for "freedom" post WW1 were fools who didn't understand the changed circumstances.

It was all abt roping as many "units" as possible to one's camp so that they emerge as prime contenders in the British last will and testament. Among all Hindu leaders, Gandhi was most successful (with collusion, cooption with sections of Brits) in creating a huge block of Hindus (which he inherited from Lokmanya Tilak's lifetime of work along with Non-Abrahamic moneybags of Western coast). 
British gave this chunk of land (which we today call modern India) to this block of Hindus which Gandhi was successful in marketing.

The Muslim chunk is by default always ever-ready since last 1400 years. They have all abrahamic political features inherently built in. The biggest achievement of Gandhi, in my opinion, is Poona Pact with Ambedkar. He ingeniously aborted a very bad idea that was forming (Dalit nation) that Ambedkar was pushing. With all his brilliance, this was a very bad idea of Ambedkar - separate electorates for Dalits. Think of a bunch of children waiting for demise of their father & lobbying to be contender as father's successor & to get away with as big a chunk of property as they can manage after division

That is Gandhi in nutshell. Prodigal Eldest in of litter who screwed other contenders. That is Gandhi, Jinnah, Ambedkar et al. While Sangh et al ended up helping Gandhian camp in this endeavor, Sangh diametrically flies against the very core idea of India.

That India is not a property to be divided - that she is a sacred geography to be worshipped and controlled. Hence it is very stupid (and yet politically correct) of Pappu to project India as a "negotiated nation-state".

He is stupid because that is not how Hindus look at India. Politically correct because that is how abrahamics view India and he has given up on Hindus as his voter-base. Pappu is not competing with BJP anymore. Pappu has given up on Hindus. He is very smart in that way. He is competing with Ovaisi and other parties relying on minority and "sekoolar" vote. He is emerging as the true contender for non-Hindu vote. Remember the slogan of anti CAA fellows from last year -

"सबका खून शामिल है इस मिट्टी मे, किसीके बाप का हिन्दुस्थान थोड़े ही है"

This is their clear-cut attempt of staking a "negotiating claim" on "property that is India". This is what Jinnah did 100 years ago. Our misfortune is, instead of some overt PIF like in 1745-1760 or 2014-2030, a negotiator Gandhi was spearheading the transition from our side in the decade of 1930-1946.


1745-1760 was the decade when Hindus best positioned to 

A. Push the envelope towards converting Islamic Indian polity into a rich Hindu polity

B. Freeing as many Towns & tīrthakshetras from the grip of Qazi-Mullah network.

Before Ummah activates. 2014-2029 is similar window. Ummah will start activating bigly from 2030s. We came a long way; achieved some tremendous & lasting things between 1745-1760 before the project stalled in 1761. We attempted many more which we could not complete. We need to complete some of those unfinished tasks in this round. If everything goes alright, Pro Hindu Force will be controlling the eastern seashore (except AP - that one unpredictable mercantile black hole) after centuries. Starting in May-2021. Imagine. After Lakshmana Sèna (who was defeated by Bakhtiyar Khilji) it might be first time. 

We could not do much on economy front in 1745-1760. We did a lot on temple front (it continued until 1818). This time we have done a lot on economy front. But not much so far on temple front (freeing from Mleccha threat is already done). We lost then because of economy and tech. Giving closure to Ram mandir, opening narrative on Mathura, attempt to solve kāshi using Vishwanath corridor - remain the greatest achievements by us in this window. 

Apart from JAM on economy front. Amongst everything else - Jandhan-Aadhaar-Mobile is the biggest achievement.

Thoughts on MVA, MA and Fox - March 6th 2021 twitter

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India License.



MVA ki itni aukaat nahi hai. This is even beyond fox. MA was and is congress supporter (at least opposes Modi for some very important key reasons). Remember “congress to apni dukaan hai”, Nira Radia tapes? This has globalists written over it. Soros types. MVA are useful fools. 

Few things cannot be shared. MA would like anyone in BJP but Modi and Shah to be PMs for 2-3 very specific reasons. His support was instrumental in formation of abomination that is MVA. Anyways it is past now. He is a national asset. And someone wants it threatened. The mahaul that Pappu has created against Hindu business tycoons is part of this strategy

How smart or dumb Pappu, his sister, jamaai, father and mother is - is irrelevant. They are the pawns of much sinister breaking India forces. They do as they are briefed by their handlers. Couple this with the ongoing tussle between Big Tech companies and Nationalist governments, data-localisation debate. 

The amount of money that was poured in Jio in final year of Trump Presidency by various sources like Facebook, Saudi king (who are now hounded by BiHarris admin) 
- all this is linked. 

MA is being sent a message. And it is Shame that fools like MVA are in power where state Home Minister does not know what police statements are. I hope MA makes peace with NaMo like Shivraj Mama made and strive to make this a param-vaibhavshali Hindu rashtra. Jio 5G and JioMart is on the way to possibly disrupt a few giants

Jack Ma was on same lines too. Paranoid Fools of CCP did the needful and killed Alibaba. It cannot happen in India due to democracy. One angle is to use pappu’s rants and PR. Perhaps it is not working much or fast. Lastly - why they all want Devendra out? Why did Devendra miss helicopter accidents 7-8 times in his tenure?

While Devendra was ruling MH, it was PMO that was ruling MH directly. MH was sort of run like a union territory - in extremely close coordination with CCS and NSA. They amount of investment that happened in MH during DF’s rule (not just monetary but strategic too) was staggering.

The current squatters are meant to squat on those strategic initiatives which they are doing brilliantly. The opposition to Devendra is of similar nature - too much and direct control from PMO and the CCS.

Anyone but Modi. Anyone but Devendra.

Standard lines by those who are part of an elaborate gravy train. What I am most curious about is - What is the threshold after which Ambani and Adani will start giving it back in kind to Pappu for tarnishing their brand value. Does MA hates NaMo so much that he is willing to take a hits on his brand value by a 2-bit fool like Pappu?

Thoughts on Devaki and her fierce Tapashcharya to be mother of shri vishNu

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India License.










रूपं यत् तत् प्राहुरव्यक्तं आद्यम्
ब्रह्मज्योति र्निर्गुणं निर्विकारम् ।

सत्तामात्रं निर्विशेषं निरीहं 
स त्वं साक्षात् विष्णु: अध्यात्मदीपः ॥ १॥

नष्टे लोके द्विपरार्धावसाने 
महाभूतेष्वादिभूतं गतेषु ।

व्यक्तेऽव्यक्तं कालवेगेन याते 
भवानेकः शिष्यते शेषसंज्ञः ॥ २॥

योऽयं काल: तस्य तेऽव्यक्तबन्धो:
चेष्टामाहुश्चेष्टते येन विश्वम् ।

निमेषादिर्वत्सरान्तो महीयां
तं त्वीशानं क्षेमधाम प्रपद्ये ॥ ३॥

मर्त्यो मृत्युव्यालभीतः पलायन्
सर्वान् लोकान् निर्वृतिं नाध्यगच्छत् ।

त्वत् पादाब्जं पाप्य यदृच्छयाद्य 
स्वस्थः शेते मृत्युरस्मादपैति ॥ ४॥

This is the Stuti of nārāyaNa by dévakī when kRshNa avatāra happened today all those years ago. It is found in 10th skandha and 3rd adhyāya of shrimad Bhāgavatam.

The price she had to pay to be the mother of shri vishNu’s avatāra is scary. Watching six new born kids murdered in front of your eyes. Yet retaining the sheer will power to stay invested in samsāra so that the 8th one is born is superhuman. That is what separates great people from us commoners. They are willing to pay price for what it takes to achieve greatness. 

But dévakī was not great. She did not aspire greatness (of wealth, name, fame, intellect etc). She did it just for that dream. Birthing The 8th One. There is no modern parameter to measure dévakī. All those parameters of greatness go unused when measuring dévakī. We can’t even call perseverance of dévakī as svānta sukhāya (for one’s own pleasure/sukha). Whatever was happening to her was not sukha. It was diametric opposite. 

Every janmāShTamī I invariably think of dévakī. It is not just the day of krishNa janma today. That is given and we all worship Shri hari on this day (and every other day) anyways. Today is also the day when dévaki’s tapas fructified. Today is day of her deliverance. The relief this woman must have felt when this happened in front of her eyes and kātyāyanī Herself reassuring her, vasudéva (and also Kansa) that “The 8th One” is safe is the final āhuti  of dévakī’s tapas. 

She was at peace since this moment.

श्रीकृष्ण गोविन्द हरे मुरारे
हे नाथ नारायण वासुदेव… 

जय श्रीकृष्ण…..

Thoughts on Radha and Krishna - Prakruti and Purusha

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India License.

I came across this tweet on twitter.




I am reminded of preface of a novel on krishNa- yugandhar. By author who wrote “Mrityunjay” on karNa - Shivaji Sawant. So plenty of revisionism. Anyways that’s not the point. Author mentions in preface about how he had to fight with himself on whether to keep rādhā in book at all. He makes these arguments (with himself) on why should rādhā be completely omitted from book. He says what is the point of mentioning fictional character. Rādhā is absent in Mahābhārata - critical edition (or any other edition). Absent in harivansha. Absent in bhāgvat. Why bother!!

He mentions ahead that Rādhā is mentioned only in some “obscure” brahmavaivarta purāNa and is a secondary character. By the way, this is the person who argued in this same book (and same preface) that the verse “चातुर्वण्य मया सृष्टं गुणकर्म विभागश:” from gītā is inserted by some “usual suspects” much later to justify casteism.

I am saying again and again this just to make a point that this person makes in this preface. 

He says,

” I almost made up my mind and deleted rādhā from initial manuscripts. Then one day I thought why is this fictional character so popular? What does it even mean? I then looked up the vyutpatti of term rādhā. Consulted many scholars from BORI and many dictionaries and amarakosha-s. 

The meaning of the word rādhā that kept emerging from each inquiry started blowing my mind away. Bhāvārtha of word Rādhā is one who yearns for jñāna/moksha. One who longs for Moksha. One who longs to reach the SOURCE. Chaitanya. 

Suddenly, the rādhā who is fictional. Rādhā whom I had meticulously deleted from my mind, my manuscripts - entered my mind and my narrative with such a force that I could not stop her. She occupied my mind and I could only helplessly watch her doing it. I started seeing rādhā in everyone. Every gopikā became rādhā. Uddhav became rādhā. Arjun became rādhā. Everyone in all places and all times who yearns or have yearned for jñāna / moksha even for a single moment in any one of the countless births - became rādhā. That is when I decided to include her in my book.

My rationality helped me keep limit on how bigger a role she will play and how much space (in terms of pages) will she occupy.

But krishNa is incomplete without rādhā. She has to be there in any story of krishNa ever told”


 I read this book in one sitting. I was perhaps 12-13 then. I could not keep this book away. 16 hours straight. Now I cannot read it. Too rational. To “chārvāka”. And many experiences due to gurukrupā have helped me see some bigger picture. And I was grappling with nirishwarvādi inclinations with what my experiences in daily sādhanā were indicating. Truly confusing times. This is when my guru subtly started pushing me towards sānkhya (I didn’t even know this word - except Gita class - 2nd chapter name)

But this preface and this revelation of Shri Shivaji Savant helped me visualise what it is like when prakriti “yearns” for moksha. When ĪshwarikrishNa says in kārikā - it is prakruti that gets moksha. Purush is always free. And it is prakruti which yearns for (and also resists) moksha. It looks schizophrenic. It didn’t make sense. And then rādhā taught me how prakruti yearns for liberation but resists  breakage of last bond. Because once last bond (of ahamkāra) is broken, she is free. And what remains is shuddha Chaitanya. Only Chaitanya. Kaivalya or lonely Chaitanya.

Lastly returning to īhalaukika plane - Without rādhā, we wouldn’t have had this heavenly composition in yaman-kalyāNa by a Gandharva incarnated on earth perhaps due to some kārmik baggage - Pandit Bhimsen Joshi.

राधाधर मधुमिलिंद जय जय

रमारमण हरि गोविंद

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIGd9aMSZgI