Sunday, March 23, 2025

Fructification dates of 90-year cycle of History of 2030s

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India License.

The dates for current fructification of the 90-year cycle of history. There are two massive events happening in this time. Guru+Rahu in death spiral AND Shani+ketu in death spiral.

24/08/2030 - shani 44 taurus, ketu 49 taurus - imagine this as two merging black-holes in their final (5 degree approach) spiral of collision. This is the date when final phases of the spiral starts.

21/09/2030 - shani (retro) 44 taurus, ketu 46 taurus
from this date onwards, both start moving back. All this happening in second paada of rohiNi nakshatra. Both are basically moving back in rohiNi hand in hand from this date.

20/10/2030 - shani (R) 43.59, ketu (R)  43.58 - the first collision. Shani accelerates in retrogression hereafter to go farther (not much) to escape the the pull of another. This happens in Navamsha of Venus. 

05/11/2030 - Guru 218, Rahu 223 - The second massive set of black-holes begin their death spiral in Scorpio (anuradha nakshatra of Shani co-ruled by ketu)

26/11/2030 - Guru 223 degrees, Rahu 223 Degrees (Anuradha 3rd paada - venus navamsha) - The actual collision of this set in tula/dhanu navamsha of anuradha-3/4)

13/12/2030 - Guru 227, Rahu 223 - 5 degree separation between the two. Thankfully, these two do not meet again later. But this is a very small mercy. Damage already done and stage set for next event.

02/02/2031 - Shani 38 taurus, Ketu 40 taurus
Shani's retrogression ends on this date. They again approach each other for one more headlong collision

23/02/2031 - shani 38.12, ketu 38.12 taurus (rohiNi first charaNa) - the date of second headlong collision of these two planets (in navamsha of mars).

30/04/2031 - Shani 40 taurus, ketu 35 taurus (finally five degree separation between the two in opposite direction).

From August 2030 to April 2031, in these 9 months something momentous is going to happen which will shatter the world. This is the time when the 90-year cycle will explode on the world (and India and Hindus). The second collision happening in Feb in Aries navamsha (which is the absolute worst position for both Shani and Ketu to be, even separately. here they are together) is especially bad. 

Think of these 9 months as the gestation period of human karma which will start bearing fruit simultaneously and will continue troubling the living world for next decade or so. Those will be the effects of this this massive event. Had guru been alone, aspecting Shani+ketu, it would have been a saving grace. Guru too is poisoned by Rahu in the nakshatra of shani (who is poisoned too) at exact same time as Shani is by Ketu. 

Last time when this happened, Hitler launched Op. Barbarossa.... I don't think even then there was guru+rahu in anuradha in addition to shani+ketu in rohiNi. This shows something worse than Op. Barbarossa.

This happened 180 years ago (1850s). Crimean War, Anglo-Indian war of independence, seeds of American Civil war, Anglo-China Opium war. As is the case with participation of guru+rahu, religion/ideology played the triggering effect in 1850s (at least in India). 

And this again happened 360 years ago in the decade of 1680s (Remember Chhava and Hindavi Swarajya's 27 year long bloody religious war with Aurangzeb). 

Whatever happens in these 9 months (August 2030 to April 2031), religion/ideology will play the triggering role here. 

Tuesday, March 18, 2025

Hacking the Human Development Index – The India Way

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India License.


By Shri. Rama Yeleshwarapu


A few days ago, I read an insightful article by an old Bharat Rakshak friend, Suraj, in Swarajya magazine about India’s journey towards Vikasit Bharat by 2047 through the lens of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). I highly recommend that readers take a look at it.

Hacking the Human Development Index: Why UNDP's Latest HDI Scores For India Are Misleading

Understanding Vikasit Bharat and SDGs

Let’s start with the basics. What is our vision, as articulated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi? We aim to become a Vikasit Bharat by 2047. But what does that mean? Essentially, it implies that the quality of life in India, for all 140+ crore citizens, will reach an average SDG score of 80 or more. The SDG score is a key indicator of long-term sustainability in quality of life, assuming there are no major disruptions like wars or catastrophic natural events.

India could have defined its own quality-of-life indicators without external influence. However, adopting an internationally recognized standard has strategic advantages. It allows India to benchmark itself against global peers and enhances its credibility in international financial markets. A high SDG score can improve India’s rankings in various financial indices, potentially lowering the cost of capital and international borrowings. Even a modest 1-2% reduction in borrowing costs could save India Rs. 2-3 lakh crore annually - equivalent to our current food security expenditure.

Of course, agreeing to an international standard brings challenges. Some indicators may not align with Indian realities, while others may conflict with India’s unique advantages. However, since our policymakers have accepted SDG standards, it makes more sense to focus on achieving high scores efficiently while preserving India’s civilizational identity.

Can India Achieve High SDG Scores?

There are 17 SDG goals measured through 105 indicators, covering various aspects of human well-being. These indicators are tracked using a complex yet widely accepted methodology, which interested readers can explore online.

To assess India’s progress, we refer to the India SDG Report 2023-24. I encourage readers to go through this report, as the goal here is not to re-state its details but to engage in a broader discussion.

A careful review of SDG goals shows that most have little to do with technological superiority or even GDP. While economic development is essential for tackling poverty, hunger, and education, GDP alone does not fully capture individual well-being. In fact, eight out of the 17 SDG goals do not depend on technological advancement. Most nations, including India, can achieve high SDG scores using existing technologies.

As of 2024, India’s SDG score stands at 71, marking a 14-point increase from 2018 (Page 67 of the report). India has already surpassed the 80-point benchmark in three out of 17 SDG goals and scored over 70 in five more. Given the Modi government’s mission-driven approach (Pages 6-9 of the report), achieving an overall score of 80 by 2029—or at the latest, by 2030—is realistic.

The Reality Behind High SDG Scores

It is important to remember that achieving a perfect score of 100 on an SDG goal does not mean all citizens enjoy equal benefits. There will always be individuals who are dissatisfied or unable to afford certain lifestyle improvements. In a country of 140 crore people, even a tiny fraction—say, one lakh (<0.0001%)—will inevitably be unhappy with some aspect of life. In today’s digital era, this small group can amplify their grievances across social media platforms like WhatsApp, Telegram, Twitter/X, Instagram, and YouTube.

To put things in perspective, China had an overall SDG score of 70.85 in 2022. India has reached a similar score in 2024, just two years behind. Even China aims to cross the 80-point mark by 2030, so India remains on track.

However, an important distinction must be made: Just because India and China both achieve an SDG score above 80 does not mean they are identical in all indicators. Differences in individual SDG scores and the methods used to achieve them will persist. Consider Finland, which has the world’s highest SDG score of 86.35, yet performs poorly in three key areas: (2) Zero Hunger, (12) Responsible Consumption and Production, and (13) Climate Action. This should remind Indians not to indulge in unnecessary self-criticism.

The India Way

The essence of SDGs lies in sustainability. A nation may achieve a perfect score temporarily, but if that progress is unsustainable, it will ultimately fail. A useful metric to assess sustainability is ecological footprint, which measures the human demand on natural resources. If the entire world lived like the United States, we would require four Earths to sustain that lifestyle. Finland’s lifestyle would require 1.4 Earths, while China’s would need three Earths.

In contrast, India’s current SDG score of 71 requires only 0.7 Earths. The Bharatiya approach must focus on achieving an SDG score above 80 while maintaining this low ecological footprint. This is a critical distinction that readers should keep in mind.

Another key aspect of India’s strategy is ensuring that Vikasit Bharat is also Virasat Bharat. India’s civilizational identity remains rooted in its Hindu heritage. If an Islamic USA can exist in Dubai and a Christian China in France, then India can certainly be a Hindu China. There can be no compromise on this civilizational foundation.

The third dimension of India’s approach is its global impact. Every nation’s progress affects others, either positively or negatively. The Spillover Index measures these cross-border influences in trade, finance, and security. With a score of 95.74, India ranks 27th globally - outperforming all G20 countries. This means India’s rise benefits the world, a claim few other G20 nations can make.

A Different Path to Development

Finally, there is the GDP argument. Many believe that becoming a developed nation requires a per capita GDP of over $40,000 (as seen in first-world countries) or at least China’s $15,000. However, India may prove otherwise. It is possible for India to achieve Vikasit Bharat status with a per capita GDP of just $5,000 by leveraging sustainable growth models. If successful, this would be a major contribution to the Global South, breaking Western financial hegemony once and for all.


India’s SDG journey is not just about improving scores but about redefining development itself. By prioritizing sustainability, cultural identity, and global responsibility, Bharat can carve out a unique and impactful path towards Vikasit Bharat 2047.